Luke Myers v. State
This text of Luke Myers v. State (Luke Myers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-10-00696-CR NO. 03-10-00697-CR
Luke Myers, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NOS. 7173 & 7174, HONORABLE TERRY L. FLENNIKEN, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Luke Myers pleaded guilty to one count of aggravated robbery and one count of
evading arrest or detention with a vehicle, and pleaded true to enhancement allegations. He did
not have an agreement as to punishment. After a hearing on punishment, the trial court assessed
sentence of concurrent prison terms of fifty years for aggravated robbery and twenty years for
evading arrest.
Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel
supported by a brief concluding that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the
requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), by presenting a professional
evaluation of the records demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See
Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie
v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant received a copy
of counsel’s brief and was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se
brief. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. No pro se brief has been filed and no extension of time to file
a pro se brief has been requested.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Garner v. State,
300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2005). We agree with counsel that this appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is
granted. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Jeff Rose, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose
Affirmed
Filed: May 11, 2011
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Luke Myers v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luke-myers-v-state-texapp-2011.