Lukachyk v. George

127 A. 68, 281 Pa. 402, 1924 Pa. LEXIS 633
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 13, 1924·No. Appeal, 78·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

While attempting to cross the tracks of defendant company, plaintiff’s husband was struck and killed by its electric car. Evidence at the trial disclosed the fact, which was not contradicted, that, though deceased saw the car approaching, he undertook to cross the tracks in front of it. A compulsory nonsuit was granted, which the court in banc refused to remove, and the present appeal followed.

We have examined the record and are of opinion the nonsuit was proper under the circumstances as disclosed by the evidence.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lukachyk v. George, 127 A. 68, 281 Pa. 402, 1924 Pa. LEXIS 633 (Pa. 1924).

127 A. 68 (Lukachyk v. George) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clark v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.
171 A. 866 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1934)