Lukachyk v. George
This text of 127 A. 68 (Lukachyk v. George) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
While attempting to cross the tracks of defendant company, plaintiff’s husband was struck and killed by its electric car. Evidence at the trial disclosed the fact, which was not contradicted, that, though deceased saw the car approaching, he undertook to cross the tracks in front of it. A compulsory nonsuit was granted, which the court in banc refused to remove, and the present appeal followed.
We have examined the record and are of opinion the nonsuit was proper under the circumstances as disclosed by the evidence.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 A. 68, 281 Pa. 402, 1924 Pa. LEXIS 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lukachyk-v-george-pa-1924.