Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/Luka v. Tri-Met (Unpc)

Luka v. Tri-Met (Unpc)

234 P.3d 1097, 236 Or. App. 237
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJuly 7, 2010
Docket081115880 A141388
StatusPublished

This text of 234 P.3d 1097 (Luka v. Tri-Met (Unpc)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Luka v. Tri-Met (Unpc), 234 P.3d 1097, 236 Or. App. 237 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

234 P.3d 1097 (2010)
236 Or. App. 237

Dominika LUKA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Respondent.

081115880; A141388.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted June 8, 2010.
Decided July 7, 2010.

Elena E. Tsiprin argued the cause for appellant. With her on the briefs was Law Offices of Elena E. Tsiprin.

Erik Van Hagen argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and DUNCAN, Judge.

*1098 PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Bonds v. Farmers Ins. Co., 227 Or.App. 185, 205 P.3d 45, rev. allowed, 347 Or. 258, 218 P.3d 540 (2009).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bonds v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Oregon
205 P.3d 45 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)
Luka v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District
234 P.3d 1097 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 P.3d 1097, 236 Or. App. 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luka-v-tri-met-unpc-orctapp-2010.