Luis Vasquez v. Michael B. Mukasey

331 F. App'x 424
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedAugust 6, 2009
Docket08-1596
StatusUnpublished

This text of 331 F. App'x 424 (Luis Vasquez v. Michael B. Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Luis Vasquez v. Michael B. Mukasey, 331 F. App'x 424 (8th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Luis Alfredo Vasquez petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that affirmed an immigration judge’s denial of his motion to reopen. Because we conclude Vasquez’s petition for review was untimely filed more than 30 days after the BIA issued its final order, we lack jurisdiction to review the order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) (petition for review “must be filed” not later than 30 days after date of final order); Fed. R.App. P. 26(a) (computation of time); Yang v. Mukasey, 510 F.3d 793, 795-96 (8th Cir.2007) (noting denial of motion to reopen is final order that has to be appealed within 30 days); Skurtu v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 651, 658 (8th Cir.2008) (dismissing petition for lack of jurisdiction because 30-day time limit for filing petition is mandatory and jurisdictional).

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Skurtu v. Mukasey
552 F.3d 651 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)
Yang v. Mukasey
510 F.3d 793 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
331 F. App'x 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luis-vasquez-v-michael-b-mukasey-ca8-2009.