Luis Ruiz Sierra v. State

Opinion

ZTAf <%£> 2eQcxris To - A/0, Oh^-aoyy^p TO: Co^r\ o-f yk%/i w The T'/st D/sfriA *r Tckos RECEIVED OF APPEALS DUSTON, TEXAS

JUN 2 4 2015 7/oa SA/e &t 7ex*s A. PRINE

/7&y 2i ."20/S? 6tA d -ike coa/-4- Ms y&w<±j Qi/ms^ ®ne arquaUe r 4w ;-f i6e ccLA fas fe^'/eJ Qpf&^i are, Jo jz~ /?&& • ibo, JZ~~, issOv/d ds>o Auk 7& kflocx/ rp -/he. AourT jhc?> Qtrtfr /y}€ #s>*{t*r- Cv^rl affbA-kl lawyer) 0/?J -flni S/&.&S %u P/&*se 77?// A*e jhg /)&u COvr-l d -JA/e Jo rS-/ AOoA^/ ~j> fe-oj afpfrl^Zh %%4Tj/ioAe < Irs c^rred . ecu^e/ w sAure. ava/ ar^ ik*f /*y Ms/ /My pffva/'T ,jd/ AW*y A<^S6aS /"&> ~fom Ape AMj uA6er$fzAd;)te //>n ,~m hof^al i/\ a*

or a/^ asSAiv/'l' ^aor^J>^ldZj or h

e^A, .~fh ^ doe /7oJ iter. /'Vf-ZT/w J-T^eS haoe lee^ rz ^ /YlY befa/f -fat*. C0/16K _X ,6oG5 j Zon U'CjeJ . J (yould /c -& QPffihf A"d SiftsACvAi(AA 7t> cfe^ lti$ &sz Sr*/rct *y&3?s$ po/x Ay/?they sA jg, / 23 S~o s/Ascoc /A !AA /A^h/epy 77'39C

v. //////

ST P,

J '

*<

O —< eg

O •3>

<

SO . L