LUIS ROVERSI, etc. v. CONVERPACK, INC., etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 16, 2021·No. 20-1420·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed June 16, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1420 Lower Tribunal No. 18-37900 ________________

Luis Roversi, Petitioner,

vs.

Converpack, Inc., Respondent.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Michael A. Hanzman, Judge.

Barakat + Bossa, PLLC, and Brian Barakat , for petitioner.

Damian & Valori LLP, and Peter F. Valori and Amanda L. Fernandez, for respondent.

Before SCALES, LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Petition denied. See Robins v. Colombo, 253 So. 3d 94, 95-96 (Fla.

3d DCA 2018) (“[W]e limit our review to whether the procedural requirements

of section 768.72 have been followed. . . . Moreover, this court is not

permitted to reweigh a trial court’s finding of a sufficient evidentiary basis for

a punitive damages claim, and such a finding could not be disturbed, or even

evaluated on certiorari review.”) (internal quotations and citations omitted).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LUIS ROVERSI, etc. v. CONVERPACK, INC., etc., (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

LUIS ROVERSI, etc. v. CONVERPACK, INC., etc. (LUIS ROVERSI, etc. v. CONVERPACK, INC., etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robins v. Colombo
253 So. 3d 94 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)