LUIS ROVERSI, etc. v. CONVERPACK, INC., etc.
This text of LUIS ROVERSI, etc. v. CONVERPACK, INC., etc. (LUIS ROVERSI, etc. v. CONVERPACK, INC., etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed June 16, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D20-1420 Lower Tribunal No. 18-37900 ________________
Luis Roversi, Petitioner,
vs.
Converpack, Inc., Respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Michael A. Hanzman, Judge.
Barakat + Bossa, PLLC, and Brian Barakat , for petitioner.
Damian & Valori LLP, and Peter F. Valori and Amanda L. Fernandez, for respondent.
Before SCALES, LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Petition denied. See Robins v. Colombo, 253 So. 3d 94, 95-96 (Fla.
3d DCA 2018) (“[W]e limit our review to whether the procedural requirements
of section 768.72 have been followed. . . . Moreover, this court is not
permitted to reweigh a trial court’s finding of a sufficient evidentiary basis for
a punitive damages claim, and such a finding could not be disturbed, or even
evaluated on certiorari review.”) (internal quotations and citations omitted).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
LUIS ROVERSI, etc. v. CONVERPACK, INC., etc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luis-roversi-etc-v-converpack-inc-etc-fladistctapp-2021.