Luis Rodriguez v. Sears Holdings Corporations, et a.

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 1, 2014·No. 14-1297·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

LUIS RODRIGUEZ, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D14-1297

SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATIONS AND SEDGWICK CMS,

Appellees.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 2, 2014.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Margret G. Kerr, Judge.

Date of Accident: November 26, 1996.

Mark L. Zientz of the Law Offices of Mark L. Zientz, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.

Mary L. Wakeman of Heuler-Wakeman Law Group, P.L., Tallahassee, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Harrell v. Fla. Construction Specialists, 834 So. 2d 352,

356 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (“We hold that the termination of supplemental benefits pursuant to . . . section 440.15(1)(f)1., Florida Statutes (1995) is not a reverse offset

pursuant to section 440.15(10) . . . .”).

BENTON, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luis Rodriguez v. Sears Holdings Corporations, et a., (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Luis Rodriguez v. Sears Holdings Corporations, et a. (Luis Rodriguez v. Sears Holdings Corporations, et a.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harrell v. FLA. CONST. SPECIALISTS/AARLA/AGENT FOR FWCIGA
834 So. 2d 352 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)