Luis Rodriguez v. Sears Holdings Corporations, et a.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Luis Rodriguez v. Sears Holdings Corporations, et a.

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 1, 2014

Docket14-1297

StatusPublished

This text of Luis Rodriguez v. Sears Holdings Corporations, et a. (Luis Rodriguez v. Sears Holdings Corporations, et a.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Luis Rodriguez v. Sears Holdings Corporations, et a., (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

LUIS RODRIGUEZ, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D14-1297

SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATIONS AND SEDGWICK CMS,

Appellees.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 2, 2014.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Margret G. Kerr, Judge.

Date of Accident: November 26, 1996.

Mark L. Zientz of the Law Offices of Mark L. Zientz, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.

Mary L. Wakeman of Heuler-Wakeman Law Group, P.L., Tallahassee, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Harrell v. Fla. Construction Specialists, 834 So. 2d 352,

356 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (“We hold that the termination of supplemental benefits pursuant to . . . section 440.15(1)(f)1., Florida Statutes (1995) is not a reverse offset

pursuant to section 440.15(10) . . . .”).

BENTON, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI