Luis Rebollar v. Texas Department of Human Services

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 20, 1991·No. 03-91-00357-CV·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS,


AT AUSTIN




NO. 3-91-357-CV


LUIS REBOLLAR,



APPELLANT



vs.


TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,


APPELLEE





FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT


NO. 471,715, HONORABLE PETE LOWRY, JUDGE




PER CURIAM



This is a dismissal for want of prosecution.

Appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal and affidavit of inability to pay costs on August 20, 1991. Tex. R. App. P. Ann. 41(a)(2) (Pamph. 1991). The record was due to be filed in this Court on or before September 4, 1991. See Tex. R. App. P. Ann. 54(a) (Pamph. 1991).

If an appellant fails to file either the transcript or the statement of facts within the prescribed time, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. Ann. 54(a) (Pamph. 1991). To date, appellant has filed neither a transcript nor a statement of facts.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. Ann. 54(a), (c) (Pamph. 1991); Veale v. Rose, 688 S.W.2d 600 (Tex. App. 1984, writ ref'd n.r.e.).



[Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Aboussie and Kidd]

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: November 20, 1991

[Do Not Publish]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luis Rebollar v. Texas Department of Human Services, (Tex. Ct. App. 1991).

Luis Rebollar v. Texas Department of Human Services (Luis Rebollar v. Texas Department of Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Veale v. Rose
688 S.W.2d 600 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1984)