Luis Manuel Avalos v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 18, 2006
Docket12-06-00194-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Luis Manuel Avalos v. State (Luis Manuel Avalos v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Luis Manuel Avalos v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

lee, elmer edward v. state

                                        NO. 12-06-00194-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

LUIS MANUEL AVALOS,  §          APPEAL FROM THE SECOND

APPELLANT

V.        §          JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE   §          CHEROKEE COUNTY, TEXAS


MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

            This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  Appellant was convicted of murder, and punishment was assessed at imprisonment for life and a $10,000 fine.  Thereafter, Appellant filed a notice of appeal.  To be sufficient to invoke the appellate court’s full jurisdiction, the notice of appeal filed by an appellant in a criminal case must bear the trial court’s certification of the appellant’s right to appeal.  Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).  The certification should be part of the record when notice is filed, but may be added by timely amendment or supplementation.  Id.  Appellant’s notice of appeal does not include the required certification.

            On September 13, 2006, this Court notified Appellant, pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 25.2 and 37.1, that the notice of appeal does not include the trial court certification.  The notice also informed Appellant that the appeal would be dismissed unless on or before October 13, 2006, the clerk’s record was amended to include the required certification.

            The deadline for responding to this Court’s notice has expired, and the clerk’s record has not been amended to show Appellant’s right to appeal.  Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Opinion delivered October 18, 2006.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Luis Manuel Avalos v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luis-manuel-avalos-v-state-texapp-2006.