Luis Leyton-Gonzalez, M.D. v. Ricardo Noyola, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Consuelo Noyola, Pedro Noyola, and Gloria N. Chapa
This text of Luis Leyton-Gonzalez, M.D. v. Ricardo Noyola, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Consuelo Noyola, Pedro Noyola, and Gloria N. Chapa (Luis Leyton-Gonzalez, M.D. v. Ricardo Noyola, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Consuelo Noyola, Pedro Noyola, and Gloria N. Chapa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBERS 13-08-00060-CR & 13-08-00061-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG _______________________________________________________
JAMES PORIS, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. _______________________________________________________
On appeal from the 347th and 319th District Courts of Nueces County, Texas. _______________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, James Poris, attempts to appeal his convictions for aggravated assault
and escape. The trial court has certified that each appeal “is a plea-bargain case, and the
defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX . R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
On January 25, 2008, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s
certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to
whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the
existence of any amended certification.
On April 4, 2008, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel’s response
does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that
appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.
The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed
if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal.
TEX . R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see also TEX . R. APP . P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, these
appeals are DISMISSED. Any pending motions are denied as moot.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 12th day of June, 2008.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Luis Leyton-Gonzalez, M.D. v. Ricardo Noyola, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Consuelo Noyola, Pedro Noyola, and Gloria N. Chapa, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luis-leyton-gonzalez-md-v-ricardo-noyola-individua-texapp-2008.