Luis Enrique Gonzalez v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service
This text of 59 F.3d 166 (Luis Enrique Gonzalez v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
59 F.3d 166
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Luis Enrique GONZALEZ, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Defendant--Appellee.
No. 95-1053.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 20, 1995.
Luis Enrique Gonzalez, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying mandamus relief. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gonzalez v. INS, No. CA-94-1636-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 13, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 F.3d 166, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23401, 1995 WL 371039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luis-enrique-gonzalez-v-us-immigration-naturalizat-ca4-1995.