Luis Benavides v. the City of San Antonio and Ernest Lane

Court of Appeals of Texas

Luis Benavides v. the City of San Antonio and Ernest Lane

DecidedJanuary 26, 2017

Docket04-16-00537-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Luis Benavides v. the City of San Antonio and Ernest Lane (Luis Benavides v. the City of San Antonio and Ernest Lane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Luis Benavides v. the City of San Antonio and Ernest Lane, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 26, 2017

No. 04-16-00741-CV

Galdino MOLINA, Appellant

v.

David CERVANTES, Appellee

From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 391399 Honorable Karen Crouch, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant’s brief was due on December 21, 2016. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). We granted Appellant’s first motion for an extension of time to file the brief, and we set the brief due on January 20, 2017. Three days after the due date, Appellant filed a second motion for an extension of time to file the brief and requested an additional sixty days, for a total extension of ninety days. Appellant’s motion is GRANTED IN PART. We ORDER Appellant to file the brief or a motion to dismiss not later than February 21, 2017. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE GRANTED. If Appellant fails to file the brief or motion to dismiss as ordered, we will order Appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). _________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 26th day of January, 2017.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 26, 2017

No. 04-16-00741-CV

Galdino MOLINA, Appellant

v.

David CERVANTES, Appellee

From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 391399 Honorable Karen Crouch, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant’s brief was due on December 21, 2016. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). We granted Appellant’s first motion for an extension of time to file the brief, and we set the brief due on January 20, 2017. Three days after the due date, Appellant filed a second motion for an extension of time to file the brief and requested an additional sixty days, for a total extension of ninety days. Appellant’s motion is GRANTED IN PART. We ORDER Appellant to file the brief or a motion to dismiss not later than February 21, 2017. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE GRANTED. If Appellant fails to file the brief or motion to dismiss as ordered, we will order Appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). _________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 26th day of January, 2017.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Luis Benavides v. the City of San Antonio and Ernest Lane, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luis-benavides-v-the-city-of-san-antonio-and-ernest-lane-texapp-2017.