LUIS A. SORO v. PEDRO JOSE LOPEZ VILLARI
This text of LUIS A. SORO v. PEDRO JOSE LOPEZ VILLARI (LUIS A. SORO v. PEDRO JOSE LOPEZ VILLARI) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed July 28, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-1261 Lower Tribunal No. 19-16697 ________________
Luis A. Soro Appellant,
vs.
Pedro Jose Lopez Villari, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Samantha Ruiz Cohen, Judge.
Luis A. Soro, in proper person.
Hoffman, Larin & Agnetti, P.A., and Michael S. Hoffman, for appellee.
Before EMAS, HENDON and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the authority of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure
9.315(a) (providing: “After service of the initial brief..., the court may summarily affirm the order to be reviewed if the court finds that no preliminary
basis for reversal has been demonstrated”). See also Soro v. Lopez, 300
So. 3d 152 (Table) (Fla. 3d DCA 2020); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of
Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (holding: “Without a record
of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the
underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is
not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing
the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that
the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
LUIS A. SORO v. PEDRO JOSE LOPEZ VILLARI, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luis-a-soro-v-pedro-jose-lopez-villari-fladistctapp-2021.