Luikart v. Wells

264 N.W. 410, 130 Neb. 172, 1936 Neb. LEXIS 22
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 10, 1936
DocketNo. 29411
StatusPublished

This text of 264 N.W. 410 (Luikart v. Wells) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Luikart v. Wells, 264 N.W. 410, 130 Neb. 172, 1936 Neb. LEXIS 22 (Neb. 1936).

Opinion

Carter, J.

This is an equity suit brought in Douglas county by E. H. Luikart, as receiver of the insolvent South Omaha State Bank, against the defendants W. A. Wells and Clara B. Wells to obtain the cancelation of two deeds to certain property claimed by defendants and to have the title to the same quieted in the receiver. The trial court entered an order canceling the deeds and quieting the title as prayed. From the overruling of their motion for a new trial, the defendants have brought the case to this court on appeal.

The evidence shows that on November 12, 1924, the Robert Parks Plumbing & Heating Company executed and delivered a mortgage on the property in question herein to the Security State Bank of Omaha for $9,000, subject to a mortgage of $3,500 held by the Omaha Loan & Building Association. On December 23, 1926, the Security State Bank obtained title to the property by foreclosure. On December 30, 1926, the South Omaha State Bank paid off the mortgage held by the Omaha Loan & Building Association by cashier’s check in the amount of $3,673.30. The record further shows that on March 23, 1927, the Security State Bank deeded the property to Thomas F. Higgins for a consideration of $5,750, and took back a mortgage of $4,750 dated March 24, 1927, payable to the South Omaha [174]*174State Bank. On March 30, 1929, Higgins deeded the property, which we will hereafter designate the Higgins property for convenience, to the South Omaha State Bank, and on May 16, 1929, the South Omaha State Bank released the mortgage that Higgins had given the bank. On December 31, 1929, the South Omaha State Bank deeded the property to Daphne S. McGurk for a consideration of one dollar. On January 18, 1930, Daphne S. McGurk and her husband, John S. McGurk, deeded the property to the defendants W. A. Wells and Clara B. Wells for a consideration of one dollar. The two deeds last above mentioned are the ones that the receiver of the South Omaha State Bank asks to have canceled.

The record further shows that prior to September 7, 1926, the Security State Bank became insolvent and was reorganized under the name of the South Omaha State Bank. On September 7, 1926, the reorganized Security State Bank, which name was subsequently changed to the South Omaha State Bank, purchased assets of the insolvent Security State Bank of the face value of $181,502.37 for the sum of $89,430, the Robert Parks Plumbing & Heating Company note and mortgage being included therein at a value of $1,250 over and above the mortgage of the Omaha Loan & Building Association. The evidence shows that the department of trade and commerce refused to permit the South Omaha State Bank to place these assets in the new bank at their face value, but did permit them to be carried as assets at an amount equal to their purchase price. The directors of the bank thereupon signed a note for the amount of $89,430 and placed it in the bank’s note case. As returns came in on the assets purchased from the receiver of the Security State Bank, the amounts thereof were credited on the directors’note until it was paid in full. The proceeds in excess of the directors’ note were carried in a fund denominated the “John S. McGurk, Trustee” account. It is the contention of defendants that the $181,502.37 worth of assets purchased of the Security State Bank were the property of the stockholders and not of the South [175]*175Omaha State Bank, and that they were placed in the bank as “collateral assets” to the directors’ note of $89,430. It is further the contention of defendants that, upon the payment of the $89,430, the assets remaining were the property of the stockholders.

The record shows that all of the $181,502.37 of assets purchased of the receiver of the Security State Bank were registered for their face value on the books of the South Omaha State Bank, although their source as an asset in the bank was shown. The record further shows that the sale of these assets was made to the reorganized Security State Bank which later became the South Omaha State Bank. The amount collected therefrom was carried in the John S. McGurk trustee account, which was carried as an asset of the bank. The real estate involved herein, while not specifically listed as an asset of the bank, was carried as “date paper,” “date paper” being defined by the witness McGurk as paper that was due from the date it was given. The evidence further shows that funds of the bank were placed in the John S. McGurk trustee account that were not obtained • from the liquidation of the purchased assets of the old Security State Bank. We are convinced, after a reading of the record, that all of the $181,502.37 of assets purchased of the insolvent Security State Bank were the property of the South Omaha State Bank. It is clear that the directors’ note of $89,430 was given to show the extent of the personal liability of the directors on this paper and to show the amount that the discounted assets was to represent as approved assets in the new South Omaha State Bank. We conclude therefore that the whole of the $181,502.37 of purchased assets was at all times the property of the bank.

The contention is made that the John S. McGurk trustee account was composed of earnings and profits of the corporation and was therefore the property of the stockholders,. as distinguished from that of the bank. In State v. Nebraska State Bank, 123 Neb. 289, 242 N. W. 613, this court said: “Earnings and profits in the possession of a corporation belong to the corporation the same as the property general[176]*176ly, and for this reason there is nothing due and owing a stockholder from the profits as a matter of debt, until a dividend is declared in some appropriate manner.” In the case at bar, the fund has been used since its inception for the use and benefit of the bank. The assets that were liquidated to provide the fund were purchased by the bank and there is no evidence in the records of the bank tending to show any one else as the owner. There has not been such a severance of the John S. McGurk trustee account from the assets of the bank that would warrant a finding that the fund had become the property of stockholders.

The witness John S. McGurk was the president, managing officer, a director and largest stockholder of the South Omaha State Bank. Clara B. Wells was the mother and W. A. Wells the stepfather of John S. McGurk. It appears from the record that in December, 1929, John S. McGurk was negotiating with the other stockholders for the purchase of their stock. At the same time, McGurk requested a loan from the defendant W. A. Wells which Wells refused. On December 23, 1929, McGurk wrote W. A. Wells, in part, as follows: “It takes $35,000 for my share down here, and if I can have mortgages for that amount, I’ll turn them into our note case here.” On December 28, 1929, W. A. Wells mailed three real estate mortgages to McGurk of a total face value of $35,000, each of the notes being indorsed in ¡blank. McGurk immediately executed and delivered his personal notes to W. A. Wells for the amounts of the notes .and mortgages sent to him. The record further shows that on December 10, 1929, the bank voted to purchase the assets of the South Omaha Safe Deposit & Loan Company as of .December 31, 1929, at which time the stockholders were to .sell their stock in the bank to McGurk. McGurk, the only ¡stockholder, on December 31, 1929, paid a stockholders’ assessment in the amount of $32,581.82, which was paid by placing the three mortgages obtained from W. A. Wells in the bank.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCann v. First National Bank of Jeffersonville
14 N.E. 251 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1887)
State ex rel. Sorensen v. Nebraska State Bank
242 N.W. 613 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1932)
Proctor v. First National Bank of Viroqua
215 N.W. 438 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
264 N.W. 410, 130 Neb. 172, 1936 Neb. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luikart-v-wells-neb-1936.