Luigi Bormioli Corp. v. United States

22 Ct. Int'l Trade 43
United States Court of International Trade·Decided January 30, 1998·No. Court No. 97-06-01049·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

Restani, Judge:

This declaratory judgment action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. There is no basis for jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1581. See Tikal Distrib. Corp. v. United States, 970 F. Supp. 1056, 1063 n.9 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1997). Because it has already declined to pay the additional money demanded by Customs for prior disclosure treatment under 19 U.S.C. § 1592, plaintiff cannot be aided by this action. Contrast Pentax Corp. v. Robison, 924 F. Supp. 193, 195-96 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1996), rev’d on other grounds, 125 F.3d 1457 (Fed. Cir. 1997). In this matter the government may never sue for additional monies and no injury may ever occur. If the government brings suit the remedies available to plaintiff in that action will be adequate to redress any harm caused by Customs’ action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luigi Bormioli Corp. v. United States, 22 Ct. Int'l Trade 43 (cit 1998).

22 Ct. Int'l Trade 43 (Luigi Bormioli Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tikal Distributing Corp. v. United States
970 F. Supp. 1056 (Court of International Trade, 1997)
Pentax Corp. v. Robison
20 Ct. Int'l Trade 486 (Court of International Trade, 1996)