Luick v. New York Railways Corp.

248 A.D. 853, 291 N.Y.S. 138, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7646

Opinion

Order denying plaintiffs’ motion to reheve them from discontinuance agreed to by their attorney, and to restore cause to the calendar for a day certain unanimously affirmed, with twenty doEars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, Q’MaEey, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luick v. New York Railways Corp., 248 A.D. 853, 291 N.Y.S. 138, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7646 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

248 A.D. 853 (Luick v. New York Railways Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.