Luhn v. Scott

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided July 11, 2008·No. 2008-1084·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1084

HAROLD R. LUHN and LUTHER J. HUESKE,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

CECIL SCOTT,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

ARMOR PRODUCTS, INC.,

Defendant.

Robert M. Bowick, Matthews, Lawson & Bowick, PLLC, of Houston, Texas, argued for plaintiffs-appellees.

Rick B. Yeager, of Austin, Texas, argued for defendant-appellant.

Appealed from: United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

Judge Lee Yeakel NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1084

Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

in CASE NO(S). 04-CV-521

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (LOURIE, Circuit Judge, CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and MOORE, Circuit Judge).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED July 11, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luhn v. Scott, (Fed. Cir. 2008).

Luhn v. Scott (Luhn v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.