Luhn v. Scott
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1084
HAROLD R. LUHN and LUTHER J. HUESKE,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
CECIL SCOTT,
Defendant-Appellant,
and
ARMOR PRODUCTS, INC.,
Defendant.
Robert M. Bowick, Matthews, Lawson & Bowick, PLLC, of Houston, Texas, argued for plaintiffs-appellees.
Rick B. Yeager, of Austin, Texas, argued for defendant-appellant.
Appealed from: United States District Court for the Western District of Texas
Judge Lee Yeakel NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1084
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas
in CASE NO(S). 04-CV-521
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (LOURIE, Circuit Judge, CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and MOORE, Circuit Judge).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED July 11, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Luhn v. Scott (Luhn v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.