Lugos-Campos v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lugos-Campos v. State

458 S.W.3d 831, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 172, 2015 WL 777609

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 24, 2015·No. No. ED 101369·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jose Antonio Lugos-Campos Jr. appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief, following an evidentiary hearing, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel and that Movant’s plea was invalid. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record orí appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jose Antonio Lugos-Campos Jr. appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief, following an evidentiary hearing, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel and that Movant’s plea was invalid. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record orí appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Lugos-Campos v. State, 458 S.W.3d 831, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 172, 2015 WL 777609 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

458 S.W.3d 831 (Lugos-Campos v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.