Lugo v. Maguire
This text of 23 F. App'x 696 (Lugo v. Maguire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Evangelista Lugo appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing defendants Maguire and Gemello in Lugo’s action alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2)(3) and 18 U.S.C. § 1512. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.1 We review de novo the district court’s dismissal, Cohen v. Stratosphere Corp., 115 F.3d 695, 700 (9th Cir.1997), and we affirm.
The district court properly determined that the judge and the prosecutor were absolutely immune from liability for damages. See Ashelman v. Pope, 793 F.2d 1072, 1075-76 (9th Cir.1986).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 F. App'x 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lugo-v-maguire-ca9-2001.