Lugert v. Cohen

101 N.E.2d 760, 303 N.Y. 642, 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 1074
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 19, 1951·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Judgments of the Appellate Division, insofar as they affirmed, the judgments in favor of plaintiffs against the defendant Hawver, Jr., affirmed, with costs to the plaintiffs. Judgments [644] of the Appellate Division, insofar as they reversed the judgments of the Trial Term and dismissed the complaints as to the defendants Cohen and Senak Co., reversed upon the ground that there was evidence of negligence upon the part of those defendants that was proper for submission to the jury, and as to those defendants case remitted to the Appellate Division for determination of the questions of fact, pursuant to sections 602 and 606 of the Civil Practice Act, with costs to abide the event. No opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Froessel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lugert v. Cohen, 101 N.E.2d 760, 303 N.Y. 642, 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 1074 (N.Y. 1951).

101 N.E.2d 760 (Lugert v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Latham Motors, Inc. v. G. F. Blackmer & Sons, Inc.
56 Misc. 2d 631 (New York County Courts, 1968)
Commisso v. Meeker
168 N.E.2d 365 (New York Court of Appeals, 1960)
Naeris v. New York Telephone Co.
6 A.D.2d 196 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
Miraglia v. Loiacono
205 Misc. 232 (New York Supreme Court, 1954)