Luger v. State
This text of 2014 ND 214 (Luger v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 12/18/14 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2014 ND 214
Chad Lee Luger, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20140106
Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Sonna M. Anderson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Mark T. Blumer, P.O. Box 7340, Fargo, ND 58106, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
Allen M. Koppy, State’s Attorney, 210 2nd Avenue NW, Mandan, ND 58554, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.
Luger v. State
[¶1] Chad Lee Luger appeals a district court order denying his petition for postconviction relief after pleading guilty to interference with a telephone during an emergency call and aggravated assault. Luger argued the district court erred in denying his petition after an evidentiary hearing because he was denied effective assistance of counsel, and the outcome would have been different had his attorney not failed to depose a witness or not advised him that he would receive a maximum sentence if he were to take the matter to trial. We conclude the district court did not err in determining Luger failed to establish ineffective assistance of counsel. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 ND 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luger-v-state-nd-2014.