Luft v. Kaplan
This text of 123 Misc. 156 (Luft v. Kaplan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The jury having retired and later requested certain information, it was manifestly error for the trial justice, in the absence of counsel and without their consent, to transmit his instructions to the jury through a court attendant. Judgment, therefore, reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.
All concur; present, Guy, Wagner and Wasservogel, JJ.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
123 Misc. 156, 204 N.Y.S. 802, 1924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luft-v-kaplan-nyappterm-1924.