Luft v. Kaplan

123 Misc. 156, 204 N.Y.S. 802, 1924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 876
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedApril 29, 1924
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 123 Misc. 156 (Luft v. Kaplan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Luft v. Kaplan, 123 Misc. 156, 204 N.Y.S. 802, 1924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The jury having retired and later requested certain information, it was manifestly error for the trial justice, in the absence of counsel and without their consent, to transmit his instructions to the jury through a court attendant. Judgment, therefore, reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, Guy, Wagner and Wasservogel, JJ.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hyman Reiver and Company v. Rose
147 A.2d 500 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1958)
Finn Hannevig & Co. v. Frankel
219 A.D. 54 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 Misc. 156, 204 N.Y.S. 802, 1924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luft-v-kaplan-nyappterm-1924.