Luff v. State
5 Ohio Law. Abs. 173
This text of 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 173 (Luff v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Luff v. State, 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 173 (Ohio 1927).
Opinion
Luff contends in the Supreme Court, that it is immaterial, that a former proceeding in error was affirmed and remanded for re-sentence, by the Supreme Court, and that when error is again presented, it makes no difference that Court of Appeals has passed on assignment of error, and fact that Appeals Court refuses to review because of no authority to do so, is not well taken.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 Ohio Law. Abs. 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luff-v-state-ohio-1927.