Luetgert Development Corp. v. Stockford

18 So. 3d 1232, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15170, 2009 WL 3232072
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 8, 2009·No. 1D09-3346·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

PER CURIAM.

Appellee’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED and this appeal is hereby DISMISSED. See § 440.25(5)(c), Fla. Stat. (2008); Fraternal Order of Eagles v. Proudfoot, 116 So.2d 245 (Fla.1959); Machin v. Lumber Transp., Inc., 556 So.2d 446 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

WEBSTER, DAVIS, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luetgert Development Corp. v. Stockford, 18 So. 3d 1232, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15170, 2009 WL 3232072 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

18 So. 3d 1232 (Luetgert Development Corp. v. Stockford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Austin v. State
18 So. 3d 1232 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)