Luehrs v. Wells Fargo Bank, Na

314 S.W.3d 624, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 4151, 2010 WL 2180381
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 2, 2010
Docket05-09-01402-CV
StatusPublished

This text of 314 S.W.3d 624 (Luehrs v. Wells Fargo Bank, Na) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Luehrs v. Wells Fargo Bank, Na, 314 S.W.3d 624, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 4151, 2010 WL 2180381 (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

OPINION PER CURIAM

PER CURIAM.

Before the Court is appellees’ April 14, 2010 motion to dismiss for want of prosecution. In the motion, appellees note that following an extension of time, appellant’s brief was due March 30, 2010 but had not been filed. To date, appellant has failed to file her brief, respond to appellees’ motion to dismiss, or otherwise communicate with the Court regarding this appeal. Accordingly, we GRANT appellees’ motion and DISMISS this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex.R.App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Valls v. Johanson & Fairless, L.L.P.
314 S.W.3d 624 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
314 S.W.3d 624, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 4151, 2010 WL 2180381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luehrs-v-wells-fargo-bank-na-texapp-2010.