Luehrs v. Wells Fargo Bank, Na
314 S.W.3d 624, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 4151, 2010 WL 2180381
Opinion
OPINION PER CURIAM
Before the Court is appellees’ April 14, 2010 motion to dismiss for want of prosecution. In the motion, appellees note that following an extension of time, appellant’s brief was due March 30, 2010 but had not been filed. To date, appellant has failed to file her brief, respond to appellees’ motion to dismiss, or otherwise communicate with the Court regarding this appeal. Accordingly, we GRANT appellees’ motion and DISMISS this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex.R.App. P. 38.8(a)(1).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Luehrs v. Wells Fargo Bank, Na, 314 S.W.3d 624, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 4151, 2010 WL 2180381 (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).
314 S.W.3d 624 (Luehrs v. Wells Fargo Bank, Na) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Valls v. Johanson & Fairless, L.L.P.
314 S.W.3d 624 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2010)