Luedeke v. Coursen

3 Misc. 559, 23 N.Y.S. 314, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 516
City of New York Municipal Court·Decided May 15, 1893·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Ehrlich, Ch. J.

Where no actual loss or injury is produced by the disobedience to an order in supplementary proceedings, the fine imposed cannot exceed $250 and costs. Code, § 2284. If actual loss or injury is produced, the amount thereof must be based upon legal proof of the damage actually sustained. Moffat v. Herman, 116 N. Y. 135 ; Sudlow v. Know, 7 Abb. (N. S.) 411; De Jonge v. Brenneman, 23 Hun, 332; Clark v. Bininger, 75 N. Y. 344; King v. Flynn, 37 Hun, 329; Gallagher v. O'Neil, 21 N. Y. St. Repr. 163. Ho such assessment of damages appears by the appeal book, and the order appealed from must, therefore, be modified by reducing the fine to the statutory limit, $250 and -$30 costs, and, as modified, the order appealed from will be affirmed, without costs. See De Jonge v. Brenneman, 23 Hun, 332 ; Erie R. R. Co. v. Ramsey, 45 N. Y. 637.

Mewburger, J., concurs.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luedeke v. Coursen, 3 Misc. 559, 23 N.Y.S. 314, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 516 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

3 Misc. 559 (Luedeke v. Coursen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ross v. La Cagnina
68 Misc. 497 (New York Supreme Court, 1910)
In re Goslin
95 A.D. 407 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)
Taber v. Manhattan Ry. Co.
35 N.Y.S. 465 (Superior Court of New York, 1895)
Taber v. Manhattan Railway Co.
70 N.Y. St. Rep. 194 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1895)