Luecke v. Bitterman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Luecke v. Bitterman

240 A.D.2d 229, 658 N.Y.S.2d 34, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6491

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 12, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 240 A.D.2d 229 (Luecke v. Bitterman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Luecke v. Bitterman, 240 A.D.2d 229, 658 N.Y.S.2d 34, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6491 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered on or about May 7, 1996, insofar as appealed from as limited by defendant’s brief, awarding damages in favor of plaintiff patient and against defendant doctor of $500,000 for past pain and suffering and $220,000 for future pain and suffering, upon plaintiff’s stipulation to reduce the jury’s award of $490,000 for future pain and suffering in lieu of a new trial thereof, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The award does not materially deviate from what is reasonable compensation for this 20-year old plaintiff’s injuries, sustained as a result of defendant’s negligence in applying liquid nitrogen in an attempt to remove an anal wart, which included a one-foot by four-inch third-degree burn that resulted in a scar on the right buttock extending to the back of the thigh, excruciating pain and two and a half years of posttraumatic stress disorder (cf., Lyall v City of New York, 228 AD2d 566). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Tom, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered on or about May 7, 1996, insofar as appealed from as limited by defendant’s brief, awarding damages in favor of plaintiff patient and against defendant doctor of $500,000 for past pain and suffering and $220,000 for future pain and suffering, upon plaintiff’s stipulation to reduce the jury’s award of $490,000 for future pain and suffering in lieu of a new trial thereof, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The award does not materially deviate from what is reasonable compensation for this 20-year old plaintiff’s injuries, sustained as a result of defendant’s negligence in applying liquid nitrogen in an attempt to remove an anal wart, which included a one-foot by four-inch third-degree burn that resulted in a scar on the right buttock extending to the back of the thigh, excruciating pain and two and a half years of posttraumatic stress disorder (cf., Lyall v City of New York, 228 AD2d 566). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Tom, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D.2d 229, 658 N.Y.S.2d 34, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luecke-v-bitterman-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack