Ludwin Lopez-Aguilar v. William Barr

935 F.3d 878
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ludwin Lopez-Aguilar v. William Barr. Read the opinion of the Court — 948 F.3d 1143
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 29, 2019·No. 17-73153·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUDWIN ISRAEL LOPEZ-AGUILAR, No. 17-73153 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A074-394-680

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, ORDER Respondent.

Filed August 29, 2019

Before: Susan P. Graber and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges, and John R. Tunheim,* District Judge.

ORDER

Petitioner’s petition for panel rehearing, Docket Entry No. 36, is GRANTED. The opinion filed April 23, 2019, and reported at 921 F.3d 898, is hereby withdrawn. The court will file a new opinion in due course. Because the court’s opinion is withdrawn, the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED as moot. Once a new opinion is filed, further petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc may be filed.

* The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ludwin Lopez-Aguilar v. William Barr, 935 F.3d 878 (9th Cir. 2019).

935 F.3d 878 (Ludwin Lopez-Aguilar v. William Barr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ludwin Lopez-Aguilar v. William Barr
921 F.3d 898 (Ninth Circuit, 2019)