Ludwigson v. Stark Carpet Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ludwigson v. Stark Carpet Corp.

159 A.D.2d 227, 551 N.Y.S.2d 930, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2191

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 1, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 159 A.D.2d 227 (Ludwigson v. Stark Carpet Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ludwigson v. Stark Carpet Corp., 159 A.D.2d 227, 551 N.Y.S.2d 930, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2191 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered on or about February 23, 1989, which denied the motion to change venue, pursuant [228]*228to CPLR 510 (3), from New York County to Nassau County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court, in the instant matter, properly exercised its discretion when it denied defendant Arrow Door Company’s motion based upon a finding that the codefendant Stark’s principal office is in New York County as is the principal place of business of the defendant, and the three material witnesses sought to be convenienced by a change of venue were employees of the codefendant Stark and that the trial of this action in New York County is imminent. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Milonas, Wallach and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered on or about February 23, 1989, which denied the motion to change venue, pursuant [228]*228to CPLR 510 (3), from New York County to Nassau County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court, in the instant matter, properly exercised its discretion when it denied defendant Arrow Door Company’s motion based upon a finding that the codefendant Stark’s principal office is in New York County as is the principal place of business of the defendant, and the three material witnesses sought to be convenienced by a change of venue were employees of the codefendant Stark and that the trial of this action in New York County is imminent. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Milonas, Wallach and Smith, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 A.D.2d 227, 551 N.Y.S.2d 930, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ludwigson-v-stark-carpet-corp-nyappdiv-1990.