Ludwig v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ludwig v. State

153 So. 3d 382, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20372, 2014 WL 7156800

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 17, 2014

Docket2D13-3726

StatusPublished

This text of 153 So. 3d 382 (Ludwig v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ludwig v. State, 153 So. 3d 382, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20372, 2014 WL 7156800 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

MORRIS, Judge.

David Michael Ludwig appeals his judgments and sentences for two counts of attempted robbery with a weapon and one count of robbery with a weapon. We reject Ludwig’s argument that the trial court failed to consider the merits of his motion to suppress which he raised for'the first time during trial, and we hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the evidence of lineup identifications made by the victims. See Hayes v. State, 581 So.2d 121, 125 (Fla.1991) (applying abuse of discretion standard to trial court’s decision to admit pretrial photo identification).

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORRIS, Judge.

David Michael Ludwig appeals his judgments and sentences for two counts of attempted robbery with a weapon and one count of robbery with a weapon. We reject Ludwig’s argument that the trial court failed to consider the merits of his motion to suppress which he raised for'the first time during trial, and we hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the evidence of lineup identifications made by the victims. See Hayes v. State, 581 So.2d 121, 125 (Fla.1991) (applying abuse of discretion standard to trial court’s decision to admit pretrial photo identification).

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

153 So. 3d 382, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20372, 2014 WL 7156800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ludwig-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack