Ludwig v. O'Brien

246 A.D. 890, 286 N.Y.S. 446

This text of 246 A.D. 890 (Ludwig v. O'Brien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ludwig v. O'Brien, 246 A.D. 890, 286 N.Y.S. 446 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs. All concur. (The order denies application for peremptory order of mandamus to compel payment of additional salary.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 A.D. 890, 286 N.Y.S. 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ludwig-v-obrien-nyappdiv-1936.