Ludwig v. Ludwig
119 A. 630, 94 N.J. Eq. 503, 9 Stock. 503, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 667
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the conclusions in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenoi-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Ealisoh, Black, Eatzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson—14.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ludwig v. Ludwig, 119 A. 630, 94 N.J. Eq. 503, 9 Stock. 503, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 667 (N.J. 1923).
119 A. 630 (Ludwig v. Ludwig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sm v. Sj
363 A.2d 353 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)