Ludwig v. Ludwig
119 A. 630, 94 N.J. Eq. 503, 9 Stock. 503, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 667
This text of 119 A. 630 (Ludwig v. Ludwig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ludwig v. Ludwig, 119 A. 630, 94 N.J. Eq. 503, 9 Stock. 503, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 667 (N.J. 1923).
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the conclusions in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenoi-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Ealisoh, Black, Eatzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson—14.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sm v. Sj
363 A.2d 353 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
119 A. 630, 94 N.J. Eq. 503, 9 Stock. 503, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ludwig-v-ludwig-nj-1923.