Ludwig v. . Gillespie
11 N.E. 835, 105 N.Y. 653, 60 Sickels 653, 1887 N.Y. LEXIS 809
Opinion
reads for affirmance,
, All concur.
! Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ludwig v. . Gillespie, 11 N.E. 835, 105 N.Y. 653, 60 Sickels 653, 1887 N.Y. LEXIS 809 (N.Y. 1887).
11 N.E. 835 (Ludwig v. . Gillespie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
D.C. Films, Inc. v. Best Film & Video Corp. (In Re Best Film & Video Corp.)
46 B.R. 861 (E.D. New York, 1985)
Frohlich & Newell Foods, Inc. v. New Sans Souci Nursing Home
109 Misc. 2d 974 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1981)
Hercules Inc. v. Dynamic Export Corp.
71 F.R.D. 101 (S.D. New York, 1976)
Stern v. Freidus
69 Misc. 2d 578 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1971)
O'Sullivan v. Jarach-Guetta Industrial Overseas Co.
194 Misc. 534 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)
Moore v. Vulcanite Portland Cement Co.
121 A.D. 667 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
Paine v. Loeb
96 F. 164 (Second Circuit, 1899)
Trimble v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
39 A.D. 403 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)
Wiehle v. Safford
27 Misc. 562 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)
Sullivan v. Shailor
40 A. 1054 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1898)
Hazard v. Wilson
22 Misc. 397 (New York Supreme Court, 1898)
Brady v. . Nally
45 N.E. 547 (New York Court of Appeals, 1896)
Berry v. Gavin
34 N.Y.S. 505 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)
Gray v. Journal of Finance Publishing Co.
21 N.Y.S. 967 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1893)
Culliford v. Gadd
17 N.Y.S. 457 (Superior Court of New York, 1892)
Culliford v. Gadd
28 Jones & S. 343 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1892)
DuBois v. Perkins
27 P. 1044 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1891)
Manette v. Simpson
15 N.Y.S. 448 (New York Supreme Court, 1891)
Braithwaite v. Aikin
48 N.W. 354 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1891)
Dean v. International, Tile Co.
14 N.Y. St. Rep. 266 (New York Supreme Court, 1888)