Ludwick v. Southern Railway Co.
This text of 212 N.C. 664 (Ludwick v. Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed on authority of Poovey v. Hickory, 210 N. C., 630, 188 S. E., 78; Scott v. Bryan, ibid., 478, 187 S. E., 756; Hardy v. Dahl, 209 N. C., 746, 184 S. E., 480; McDonald v. Zimmerman, 206 N. C., 746, 175 S. E., 92. The Court will not undertake to chart the course of the trial, or to delimit the hearing, upon attenuate questions of pleading. Pemberton v. Greensboro, 205 N. C., 599, 172 S. E., 196; S. c., 203 N. C., 514, 166 S. E., 396.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
212 N.C. 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ludwick-v-southern-railway-co-nc-1937.