Ludwick v. Southern Railway Co.
212 N.C. 664
Opinion
Affirmed on authority of Poovey v. Hickory, 210 N. C., 630, 188 S. E., 78; Scott v. Bryan, ibid., 478, 187 S. E., 756; Hardy v. Dahl, 209 N. C., 746, 184 S. E., 480; McDonald v. Zimmerman, 206 N. C., 746, 175 S. E., 92. The Court will not undertake to chart the course of the trial, or to delimit the hearing, upon attenuate questions of pleading. Pemberton v. Greensboro, 205 N. C., 599, 172 S. E., 196; S. c., 203 N. C., 514, 166 S. E., 396.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ludwick v. Southern Railway Co., 212 N.C. 664 (N.C. 1937).
212 N.C. 664 (Ludwick v. Southern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Parker v. Duke University
55 S.E.2d 189 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)