Ludwick v. Davenport-Treacy Piano Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Ludwick v. Davenport-Treacy Piano Co.

112 N.Y.S. 1023

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 24, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 112 N.Y.S. 1023 (Ludwick v. Davenport-Treacy Piano Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ludwick v. Davenport-Treacy Piano Co., 112 N.Y.S. 1023 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is no direct evidence nor any testimony from which a legitimate inference can be drawn that Cassidy, to whom the plaintiff had delivered her piano for repairs and which is the subject of this action, had any authority to deliver the same to the defendant, without which evidence it would have no right to enforce a lien against the plaintiff. Gluckman v. Kleiman, 3 Misc. Rep. 97, 22 N. Y. Supp. 549.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

There is no direct evidence nor any testimony from which a legitimate inference can be drawn that Cassidy, to whom the plaintiff had delivered her piano for repairs and which is the subject of this action, had any authority to deliver the same to the defendant, without which evidence it would have no right to enforce a lien against the plaintiff. Gluckman v. Kleiman, 3 Misc. Rep. 97, 22 N. Y. Supp. 549.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 N.Y.S. 1023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ludwick-v-davenport-treacy-piano-co-nyappterm-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack