Ludwick v. Davenport-Treacy Piano Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Ludwick v. Davenport-Treacy Piano Co.

112 N.Y.S. 1023

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 24, 1908·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is no direct evidence nor any testimony from which a legitimate inference can be drawn that Cassidy, to whom the plaintiff had delivered her piano for repairs and which is the subject of this action, had any authority to deliver the same to the defendant, without which evidence it would have no right to enforce a lien against the plaintiff. Gluckman v. Kleiman, 3 Misc. Rep. 97, 22 N. Y. Supp. 549.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

There is no direct evidence nor any testimony from which a legitimate inference can be drawn that Cassidy, to whom the plaintiff had delivered her piano for repairs and which is the subject of this action, had any authority to deliver the same to the defendant, without which evidence it would have no right to enforce a lien against the plaintiff. Gluckman v. Kleiman, 3 Misc. Rep. 97, 22 N. Y. Supp. 549.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event

Ludwick v. Davenport-Treacy Piano Co., 112 N.Y.S. 1023 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

112 N.Y.S. 1023 (Ludwick v. Davenport-Treacy Piano Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related