Ludvigsen v. Lee & Simmons, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ludvigsen v. Lee & Simmons, Inc.

9 A.D.2d 690, 192 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6653

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 19, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 9 A.D.2d 690 (Ludvigsen v. Lee & Simmons, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ludvigsen v. Lee & Simmons, Inc., 9 A.D.2d 690, 192 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6653 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the complaint was dismissed at the close of the plaintiff’s ease and the court thereupon dismissed the cross complaint and the third-party complaint of the National Sugar Refining Company. Plaintiff appeals from so much of the judgment entered thereon as dismisses the complaint. Defendant and third-party plaintiff National Sugar Refining Company appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of said judgment as dismisses the cross complaint and third-party complaint. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents Lee & Simmons, Inc., and National Sugar Refining Company, payable by appellant Ludvigsen. Present — Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the complaint was dismissed at the close of the plaintiff’s ease and the court thereupon dismissed the cross complaint and the third-party complaint of the National Sugar Refining Company. Plaintiff appeals from so much of the judgment entered thereon as dismisses the complaint. Defendant and third-party plaintiff National Sugar Refining Company appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of said judgment as dismisses the cross complaint and third-party complaint. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents Lee & Simmons, Inc., and National Sugar Refining Company, payable by appellant Ludvigsen. Present — Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A.D.2d 690, 192 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ludvigsen-v-lee-simmons-inc-nyappdiv-1959.