Ludlum Enterprises, Inc. v. Deem Investment Corp.
This text of 265 So. 2d 388 (Ludlum Enterprises, Inc. v. Deem Investment Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal and heard oral argument. On the basis thereof, we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been demonstrated. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed. See Arison Shipping Company v. Klosters Rederi A/S, Fla.App.1971, 259 So.2d 784; Edenfield v. Crisp, Fla.App.1966, 186 So.2d 545, arid Insurance Management, Inc. v. McLeod, Fla.App.1966, 194 So.2d 16.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
265 So. 2d 388, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ludlum-enterprises-inc-v-deem-investment-corp-fladistctapp-1972.