Ludlum Enterprises, Inc. v. Deem Investment Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ludlum Enterprises, Inc. v. Deem Investment Corp.

265 So. 2d 388, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6399

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 29, 1972·No. No. 71-1043·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal and heard oral argument. On the basis thereof, we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been demonstrated. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed. See Arison Shipping Company v. Klosters Rederi A/S, Fla.App.1971, 259 So.2d 784; Edenfield v. Crisp, Fla.App.1966, 186 So.2d 545, arid Insurance Management, Inc. v. McLeod, Fla.App.1966, 194 So.2d 16.

Affirmed.

[389] MAGER, J., and WHITE, JOSEPH S., Associate Judge, concur. WALDEN, J., dissents, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal and heard oral argument. On the basis thereof, we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been demonstrated. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed. See Arison Shipping Company v. Klosters Rederi A/S, Fla.App.1971, 259 So.2d 784; Edenfield v. Crisp, Fla.App.1966, 186 So.2d 545, arid Insurance Management, Inc. v. McLeod, Fla.App.1966, 194 So.2d 16.

Affirmed.

[389] MAGER, J., and WHITE, JOSEPH S., Associate Judge, concur. WALDEN, J., dissents, with opinion.

Ludlum Enterprises, Inc. v. Deem Investment Corp., 265 So. 2d 388, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6399 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

265 So. 2d 388 (Ludlum Enterprises, Inc. v. Deem Investment Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related