Ludlow v. Hackett

18 Johns. 252
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1820
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 18 Johns. 252 (Ludlow v. Hackett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ludlow v. Hackett, 18 Johns. 252 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1820).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In Heffernan v. Brown, we decided, at the last term, that where a defendant obtains a discharge under the act giving relief in cases of imprisonment, the plaintiff might discontinue his suit without costs, in the same manner as if the defendant had been discharged from all his debts under the insolvent act. If the plaintiff, knowing of the defendant’s discharge, will, nevertheless, go on with the suit, he must, if he afterwards discontinues, pay costs. Let the plaintiff have leave to discontinue his suit on payment of the costs of suit since the defendant obtained his discharge under the late act, and up to the time of the entry of the rule for a discontinuance, exclusive of the costs of the application made at the last term.

Rule accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ludington v. Bell
13 Jones & S. 513 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1879)
De Barante v. Deyermand
40 How. Pr. 180 (New York Court of Appeals, 1869)
Hyde v. Van Valkenburgh
1 Daly 416 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1865)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Johns. 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ludlow-v-hackett-nysupct-1820.