Ludlow Manufacturing & Sales Co. v. Dolphin Jute Mills, Inc.
145 F.2d 471, 63 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 360, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 2552
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided December 1, 1944·No. No. 8474·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
After study of the briefs and the record in this case we see no occasion for further discussion of the valid reasons cogently and clearly set forth in the opinion of Judge Smith, 50 F.Supp. 395, for declaring the claims of the patent sub judice to be invalid. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ludlow Manufacturing & Sales Co. v. Dolphin Jute Mills, Inc., 145 F.2d 471, 63 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 360, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 2552 (3d Cir. 1944).
145 F.2d 471 (Ludlow Manufacturing & Sales Co. v. Dolphin Jute Mills, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Uncas Manufacturing Co. v. McGrath-Hamin, Inc.
265 F. Supp. 1008 (D. Rhode Island, 1967)