Ludlow Manufacturing & Sales Co. v. Dolphin Jute Mills, Inc.
145 F.2d 471, 63 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 360, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 2552
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedDecember 1, 1944
DocketNo. 8474
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 145 F.2d 471 (Ludlow Manufacturing & Sales Co. v. Dolphin Jute Mills, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ludlow Manufacturing & Sales Co. v. Dolphin Jute Mills, Inc., 145 F.2d 471, 63 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 360, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 2552 (3d Cir. 1944).
Opinion
After study of the briefs and the record in this case we see no occasion for further discussion of the valid reasons cogently and clearly set forth in the opinion of Judge Smith, 50 F.Supp. 395, for declaring the claims of the patent sub judice to be invalid. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Uncas Manufacturing Co. v. McGrath-Hamin, Inc.
265 F. Supp. 1008 (D. Rhode Island, 1967)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
145 F.2d 471, 63 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 360, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 2552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ludlow-manufacturing-sales-co-v-dolphin-jute-mills-inc-ca3-1944.