Ludington v. Seaton
32 Misc. 736, 66 N.Y.S. 497
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 15, 1900·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The evidence warrants the conclusion that the repairs on the house were made with the consent of the defendant, and, therefore, the making of such repairs did not constitute an eviction, or operate as a surrender of the lease and acceptance of the surrender by the' plaintiff. Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.
Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ludington v. Seaton, 32 Misc. 736, 66 N.Y.S. 497 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).
32 Misc. 736 (Ludington v. Seaton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thompson v. R. B. Realty Co.
177 P. 769 (Washington Supreme Court, 1919)
Olson v. Schevlovitz
91 A.D. 405 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)