Ludington v. Seaton
This text of 32 Misc. 736 (Ludington v. Seaton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence warrants the conclusion that the repairs on the house were made with the consent of the defendant, and, therefore, the making of such repairs did not constitute an eviction, or operate as a surrender of the lease and acceptance of the surrender by the' plaintiff. Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.
Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 Misc. 736, 66 N.Y.S. 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ludington-v-seaton-nyappterm-1900.