Ludington Cigarette Mach. Co. v. Anargyros

Second Circuit

Ludington Cigarette Mach. Co. v. Anargyros

188 F. 318, 110 C.C.A. 296, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4331

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJune 26, 1911

DocketNo. 284

StatusPublished

This text of 188 F. 318 (Ludington Cigarette Mach. Co. v. Anargyros) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ludington Cigarette Mach. Co. v. Anargyros, 188 F. 318, 110 C.C.A. 296, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4331 (2d Cir. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of Judge Hazel is especially directed toward the validity and infringement of the broadest claims of the two patents, viz., claim 1 of the machine patent and claim 3 of the process patent, and, upon that opinion we affirm the decree appealed from so far as it relates to such claims. Upon careful consideration, however, we are not entirely satisfied that the defendants infringe the other claims in issue, and consequently the scope of the decree must be curtailed.

[323]*323The decree of the Circuit Court is modified by limiting its application to claim 1 of patent No. 711,986 and to claim 3 of patent No. 711,987, and as so modified is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of Judge Hazel is especially directed toward the validity and infringement of the broadest claims of the two patents, viz., claim 1 of the machine patent and claim 3 of the process patent, and, upon that opinion we affirm the decree appealed from so far as it relates to such claims. Upon careful consideration, however, we are not entirely satisfied that the defendants infringe the other claims in issue, and consequently the scope of the decree must be curtailed.

[323]*323The decree of the Circuit Court is modified by limiting its application to claim 1 of patent No. 711,986 and to claim 3 of patent No. 711,987, and as so modified is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 F. 318, 110 C.C.A. 296, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ludington-cigarette-mach-co-v-anargyros-ca2-1911.