Luddy v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.
96 N.E. 675, 210 Mass. 293, 1911 Mass. LEXIS 1053
This text of 96 N.E. 675 (Luddy v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Luddy v. Old Colony Street Railway Co., 96 N.E. 675, 210 Mass. 293, 1911 Mass. LEXIS 1053 (Mass. 1911).
Opinion
Upon this agreed statement of facts it could not be ruled as matter of law that the defendant was negligent. That question was one of fact and not of law; therefore in finding for the defendant the judge is not shown to have made any error of law. See Cunningham v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. 200 Mass. 333, and cases there cited.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Diffenderfer v. Pennsylvania Railroad
67 Pa. Super. 187 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
96 N.E. 675, 210 Mass. 293, 1911 Mass. LEXIS 1053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luddy-v-old-colony-street-railway-co-mass-1911.