Ludden & Bates Southern Music House v. McDonald

43 S.E. 425, 117 Ga. 60, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 151
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 7, 1903·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Fish, J.

In order to sustain the defense pleaded in this case, it was necessary to show that the plaintiff ratified a previously unauthorized act of its agent. As is well settled, it is essential that such ratification, to be binding on the principal, must be made with full knowledge on his part of ail the material facts relating to the act in question. There being no evidence upon the trial warranting a finding that the plaintiff had any knowledge of the act of the agent upon which the defense was based, the verdict for the defendant was without evidence to support it, and the court erred in not granting' a new trial. Judgment reversed.

By five Justices.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ludden & Bates Southern Music House v. McDonald, 43 S.E. 425, 117 Ga. 60, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 151 (Ga. 1903).

43 S.E. 425 (Ludden & Bates Southern Music House v. McDonald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mendel v. Converse & Co.
118 S.E. 586 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Brooke v. Cartersville Chero-Cola Bottling Co.
99 S.E. 150 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Janko v. Commercial Security Co.
99 S.E. 136 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Shedd v. Standard Sewing Machine Co.
94 S.E. 646 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Peeples v. Perry
89 S.E. 461 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Foddrill v. Dooley
63 S.E. 350 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)