Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Luczak v. Mariove

Luczak v. Mariove

116 A. 925, 93 N.J. Eq. 501, 8 Stock. 501, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 324
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 2, 1922·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Pee-Curiam.

■' The decree appealed- from will be-affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Foster.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, ‘Black, Katzenbach, White, Williams, Gardner, Van Buskirk — 12. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luczak v. Mariove, 116 A. 925, 93 N.J. Eq. 501, 8 Stock. 501, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 324 (N.J. 1922).

116 A. 925 (Luczak v. Mariove) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heim & Hillbrook Acres, Inc. v. Shore
151 A.2d 556 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1959)
Bondarchuk v. Barber
38 A.2d 872 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Feldman v. Warshawsky
196 A. 205 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1937)
Miller v. Headley
158 A. 118 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1932)
Zippler v. Westney
149 A. 539 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1930)
Koperski v. Wira
129 A. 185 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1925)