Luczak v. Mariove

116 A. 925, 93 N.J. Eq. 501, 8 Stock. 501, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 324
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 2, 1922
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 116 A. 925 (Luczak v. Mariove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Luczak v. Mariove, 116 A. 925, 93 N.J. Eq. 501, 8 Stock. 501, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 324 (N.J. 1922).

Opinion

Pee-Curiam.

■' The decree appealed- from will be-affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Foster.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, ‘Black, Katzenbach, White, Williams, Gardner, Van Buskirk — 12. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heim & Hillbrook Acres, Inc. v. Shore
151 A.2d 556 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1959)
Bondarchuk v. Barber
38 A.2d 872 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Feldman v. Warshawsky
196 A. 205 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1937)
Miller v. Headley
158 A. 118 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1932)
Zippler v. Westney
149 A. 539 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1930)
Koperski v. Wira
129 A. 185 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 A. 925, 93 N.J. Eq. 501, 8 Stock. 501, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luczak-v-mariove-nj-1922.