Lucyann Kuznitz v. Homeowners Choice Property & Casualty Insurance Company

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed August 20, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D25-1362 Lower Tribunal No. 16-2257-CA-01 ________________

Lucyann Kuznitz, Appellant,

vs.

Homeowners Choice Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Appellee.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William Thomas, Judge.

Neblett Law Group, and David A. Neblett and James M. Mahaffey III, for appellant.

Bush Ross, P.A., and Bryan D. Hull (Tampa), for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, GORDO and LOBREE, JJ.

GORDO, J. ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Appellant Lucyann Kuznitz (“Kuznitz”) appeals a non-final order

denying her renewed motion to enforce settlement agreement and for

reconsideration.

On July 23, 2025, this Court ordered Kuznitz to show cause as to why

this appeal should not be dismissed as taken from a non-final, non-

appealable order. Upon review of the response, we dismiss the appeal for

lack of jurisdiction as it arises from a non-final, non-appealable order. See

Dexx Med. Indus., CA v. Fitesa Naotecidos S.A., 346 So. 3d 1215, 1217 (Fla.

3d DCA 2022) (“Our appellate jurisdiction to review non-final orders is limited

to only those orders specifically listed in rule 9.130(a)(3).”); Fla. R. App. P.

9.130(a)(3)(C)(ix) (authorizing appeals of non-final orders determining “that,

as a matter of law, a settlement agreement is unenforceable, is set aside, or

never existed”); Nuñez v. Casals, 393 So. 3d 754, 754 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024)

(“Because the trial court’s order . . . did not expressly determine, as a matter

of law, that a settlement agreement never existed, we dismiss the appeal for

lack of jurisdiction.”).

Dismissed.