Lucy v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lucy v. State

540 S.W.3d 1

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 13, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105139

StatusPublished

This text of 540 S.W.3d 1 (Lucy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lucy v. State, 540 S.W.3d 1 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Aaron Lucy appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Lucy was convicted of murder in the first-degree, abuse of a child resulting in death, two counts of armed criminal action, and tampering with physical evidence. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Aaron Lucy appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Lucy was convicted of murder in the first-degree, abuse of a child resulting in death, two counts of armed criminal action, and tampering with physical evidence. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

540 S.W.3d 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lucy-v-state-moctapp-2018.