Lucy v. Pumfrey

1 Add. 380
CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County
DecidedFebruary 15, 1799
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Add. 380 (Lucy v. Pumfrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lucy v. Pumfrey, 1 Add. 380 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1799).

Opinion

President.

The question may be of considerable importance, and deserve further discussion ; I hope, therefore, the party against whom our opinion is will put it in a way of being examined on a writ of Error. And I am glad, for this reason, that our opinion happens to be against the party best able to do this.

We do not admit the testimony. It would reduce that certainty of a registry, intended by the law, to a state of absolute uncertainty. An error in the christian name is essential, unless corrected by another description annexed, as wife, bishop, earl, &c. Fraud and perjury Would be let in, to defeat the purposes of the law, and make slaves of Negroes really free. The fault lies with the master, and he must bear the consequences.

Simonson tendered a bill of exceptions.

There was a verdict for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Add. 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lucy-v-pumfrey-pactcomplwashin-1799.