Lucy v. Adams

350 U.S. 1, 76 S. Ct. 33, 100 L. Ed. 2d 3, 100 L. Ed. 3, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 340
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 10, 1955
Docket294 M
StatusPublished
Cited by28 cases

This text of 350 U.S. 1 (Lucy v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lucy v. Adams, 350 U.S. 1, 76 S. Ct. 33, 100 L. Ed. 2d 3, 100 L. Ed. 3, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 340 (1955).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioners, Autherine J. Lucy and Polly Anne Myers, citizens of Alabama, have been seeking admission to the University of Alabama since September 1952. Respondent William F. Adams is Dean of Admissions of the University. After hearings, United States District Judge Grooms of the Northern District of Alabama found that petitioners had been denied admission to the University “solely on account of their race and color.” Holding this *2 denied petitioners equal protection of state laws, the court permanently enjoined respondent Adams, his agents, employees and others acting in concert with respondent “from denying the plaintiffs and others similarly situated the right to enroll in the University of Alabama and pursue courses of study thereat, solely on account of their race or color.” 134 F. Supp. 235. Respondent’s motion to suspend the injunction pending appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit was granted by the District Judge. A judge of that court denied a motion to vacate the suspension and reinstate the injunction. A similar motion is now before us.

The motion is granted and the injunction is reinstated to the extent that it enjoins and restrains the respondent and others designated from denying these petitioners, Autherine Lucy and Polly Anne Myers, the right to enroll in the University of Alabama and pursue courses of study there. Sipuel v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, 332 U. S. 631; Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U. S. 629; McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, 339 U. S. 637. In other respects, the motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Skokomish Indian v. Tacoma Public Utilities
401 F.3d 979 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
JANATI-ATAIE
14 I. & N. Dec. 216 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 1972)
Harvest v. Board of Public Instruction
312 F. Supp. 269 (M.D. Florida, 1970)
Coppedge v. Franklin County Board of Education
293 F. Supp. 356 (E.D. North Carolina, 1968)
NGAN
10 I. & N. Dec. 725 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 1964)
Watson v. City of Memphis
373 U.S. 526 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Meredith v. Fair
306 F.2d 374 (Fifth Circuit, 1962)
Mary Ann Evans, an Infant, by Helen Evans, Her Guardian Ad Litem v. Jane Ennis, Vincent A. Theisen, Marvel O. Watson, Roy A. Wentz, Ralph Grapperhaus, Harold B. English, Members of the State Board of Education, George R. Miller, Jr., State Superintendent of Public Instruction, Richard W. Comegys, Harry W. Moor, G. Francis Downs, Mary W. Jarrell, Members of the Board of Trustees of Clayton School District No. 119. Eugene Harris, an Infant, by Thomas Harris, His Guardian Ad Litem v. Jane Ennis, Vincent A. Theisen, Marvel O. Watson, Roy A. Wentz, Ralph Grapperhaus, Harold B. English, Members of the State Board of Education, George R. Miller, Jr., State Superintendent of Public Instruction, Max R. Corder, E. Crerar Bennet, Jr., Ernest C. MacKlin George A. Robbins, Members of the Board of Education of the Milford Special School District. Julie Coverdale, an Infant, by Annie E. Coverdale, Her Guardian Ad Litem v. Jane Ennis, Vincent A. Theisen, Marvel O. Watson, Roy A. Wentz, Ralph Grapperhaus, Harold B. English, Members of the State Board of Education, George R. Miller, Jr., State Superintendent of Public Instruction, Wilbur C. Root, Norman C. Hamsted, Harry Webb, Majorie Baker, Members of the Board of Trustees of Greenwood School District No. 91. Eyvonne Holloman, an Infant, by Flossie Holloman, Her Guardian Ad Litem v. Jane Ennis, Vincent A. Theisen, Marvel O. Watson, Roy A. Wentz, Ralph Grapperhaus, Harold B. English, Members of the State Board of Education, George R. Miller, Jr., State Superintendent of Public Instruction, Howard T. West, John T. Fisher, Norman Clifton, Albert Lank, Members of the Board of Trustees of Milton School District No. 8. David Creighton, an Infant, by Josephine Creighton, His Guardian Ad Litem v. Jane Ennis, Vincent A. Theisen, Marvel O. Waston, Roy A. Wentz, Ralph Grapperhaus, Harold B. English, Members of the State Board of Education, George R. Miller, Jr., State Superintendent of Public Instruction, Ford M. Warrington, Otis P. Carmine, Clarence J. Evans, Homer L. Disharoon, Jr., Members of the Board of Education of the Laurel Special School District. Marvin Denson, an Infant, by Clarence Denson, His Guardian Ad Litem v. Jane Ennis, Vincent A. Theisen, Marvel O. Watson, Roy A. Wentz, Ralph Grapperhaus, Harold B. English, Members of the State Board of Education, George R. Miller, Jr., State Superintendent of Public Instruction, Robert H. Stamm, Irene F. Larrimore, Oscar W. Allen, Jr., John C. Rawlins, Members of the Board of Education of the Seaford Special School District. Thomas J. Oliver, Jr., an Infant, by Thomas J. Oliver, His Guardian Ad Litem v. Jane Ennis, Vincent A. Theisen, Marvel O. Watson, Roy A. Wentz, Ralph Grapperhaus, Harold B. English, Members of the State Board of Education, George R. Miller, Jr., State Superintendent of Public Instruction, Raymond Townsend, George H. Bunting, William B. Chandler, Jr., Roland v. Cobb, Members of the Board of Trustees of John M. Clayton School
281 F.2d 385 (Third Circuit, 1960)
Evans v. Ennis
281 F.2d 385 (Third Circuit, 1960)
Reed v. Hollywood Professional School
338 P.2d 633 (California Court of Appeal, 1959)
Browder v. Gayle
142 F. Supp. 707 (M.D. Alabama, 1956)
State Ex Rel. Hawkins v. Board of Control
83 So. 2d 20 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
350 U.S. 1, 76 S. Ct. 33, 100 L. Ed. 2d 3, 100 L. Ed. 3, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lucy-v-adams-scotus-1955.