Lucretia J. Vann v. Boncidium, LLC
This text of Lucretia J. Vann v. Boncidium, LLC (Lucretia J. Vann v. Boncidium, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed June 18, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D25-1759 Lower Tribunal No. 19-25792-CA-01 ________________
Lucretia J. Vann, Appellant,
vs.
Boncidium, LLC, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Javier Enriquez, Judge.
Lucretia J. Vann, in proper person.
Law Offices of Damian G. Waldman, P.A., and Damian G. Waldman, and Farha Ahmend (Largo), for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, LOBREE and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 671.201(23)(a), Fla. Stat. (2025) (“‘Holder’ means . .
. [t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either
to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession”); §
673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2025) (“The term ‘person entitled to enforce’ an
instrument means . . . [t]he holder of the instrument”); Gevertz v. Gevertz,
566 So. 2d 541, 544 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (“Florida law does not require that
a mortgage be recorded within a certain time period in order to be
enforceable.”); Wolkoff v. Am. Home Mortg. Servicing, Inc., 153 So. 3d 280,
281 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (“Typically a foreclosure plaintiff proves the amount
of indebtedness through the testimony of a competent witness who can
authenticate the mortgagee’s business records and confirm that they
accurately reflect the amount owed on the mortgage. Thereafter, the
business records are admitted into evidence.”); Bank of N.Y. v. Calloway,
157 So. 3d 1064, 1071 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (“Where a business takes
custody of another business’s records and integrates them within its own
records, the acquired records are treated as having been ‘made’ by the
successor business, such that both records constitute the successor
business’s singular ‘business record.’ However, since records crafted by a
separate business lack the hallmarks of reliability inherent in a business’s
self-generated records, proponents must demonstrate not only that ‘the other
2 requirements of [the business records exception rule] are met’ but also that
the successor business relies upon those records and ‘the circumstances
indicate the records are trustworthy.’”) (internal citation omitted); §
90.803(6)(a), Fla. Stat. (2025).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lucretia J. Vann v. Boncidium, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lucretia-j-vann-v-boncidium-llc-fladistctapp-2026.