Lucore v. Kramer

22 Iowa 387
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedJune 19, 1867
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 22 Iowa 387 (Lucore v. Kramer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lucore v. Kramer, 22 Iowa 387 (iowa 1867).

Opinion

Lowe, Ch. J.

1. Executor and administrator: set-off. There was no eiTor in overruling the demurrer. The defendant’s claim, as a set-off, existed long before the death of Rufus IT. Lucore, the payee of the note. Had suit been brought upon this note in his life-time, the defendant’s right of set-off would be unquestioned. The death of Lucore does not have the effect to repeal or supersede this right; the doctrine being, that mutual claims compensate each other. The amount which may be due, is always the balance left after deducting the lesser from the greater sum. If in tills case the defendant’s claim should exceed that of the plaintiff’s, the judgment rendered in his favor can only be collected as other demands againt the estate.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smeaton v. Cole
94 N.W. 909 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1903)
Wikel v. Garrison
48 N.W. 803 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1891)
Ware v. Howley
27 N.W. 789 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1886)
Van Sandt v. Dows & Co.
19 N.W. 669 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Iowa 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lucore-v-kramer-iowa-1867.